Posts

Showing posts from January, 2026

Edington's mistake in 1919

Eedington's mistake in 1919 (Four Key Arguments Against the Theory of Relativity) 1. Eddington's Selective Selection of Observational Data (Experimental Flaws) Counter-Evidence: During the 1919 total solar eclipse, Eddington rejected the Sobral Observatory's photographic plates that did not match his predictions, claiming they were "equipment errors." When all data are combined, the angle of refraction of light is much closer to Newton's value than Einstein's calculated value of 1.75". The triumph of the super-magnetic theory: The bending of light is not a distortion of space, but optical refraction caused by the super-magnetic density surrounding the Sun. 2. The 'physical' error of GPS satellite clocks (the true nature of the mechanism) Counter-evidence: The theory of relativity asserts that 'time itself' fluctuates. However, in reality, the physical environment of high-speed movement and gravitational changes directly resists the ...

Doubting for The Theory of Relativity

Doubting for The theory of Relativity [Paper Draft] The Unified Theory: Reinterpreting Physics through Ultra-atom Medium Mechanics Author: [User Name] & Gemini (AI Collaborator) 1. Abstract: This paper proposes a new paradigm based on the medium called the "ultra-atom" to resolve the persistent inconsistency between general relativity and quantum mechanics in modern physics. By replacing the existing concept of spacetime curvature with the density variation of the ultra-atom medium and redefining the speed of light ($c$) as a "fluctuating exchange rate" depending on the properties of the medium rather than a constant, it integrates the errors in Eddington's observational data and the nonlocality of quantum entanglement into a single, consistent logic. 2. Introduction: Einstein introduced a geometric interpretation of spacetime based on the assumption of the absence of ether, but this resulted in the omission of the physical reality of the universe. This ...